maxofthewell points to the announcement at the top of ""Regretfully, the OBEX hacker's contest for the Motorola v710 was unsuccessful. As of the contest's deadline (January 3, 2005) nobody has stepped forward to claim the prize. Many useful inventions and modifications came out of this effort." Full report here." This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted. V710 Hacker Reward Program Unsuccessful Log in/Create an Account | Top | 16 comments | Search Discussion Display Options Threshold: -1: 16 comments 0: 15 comments 1: 12 comments 2: 7 comments 3: 2 comments 4: 2 comments 5: 0 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads) The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. Holding out? (Score:1) by Don Giannullo (780981) on Saturday January 08, @06:33PM (#11299805) With all of the flashes/flexes available for other motorola phones, it seems odd to me that no one has gotten their hands on the oem software yet.or atleast find a way to extract the entire software from the OEM v710 that a certain HoFo user has. Unfortunatly Common (Score:4, Insightful) by MBCook (132727) <foobarsoft@foobarsoft.com> on Saturday January 08, @06:34PM (#11299828) (http://www.foobarsoft.com/) Why sell people what they WANT when we can sell them something LIKE it and charge them EXTRA for what they should get in the first place.This is all too common. People should boycott Verizon (or at least the v710) untill they decide to get their act together. It's easier to teach one phone company a lesson NOW before some genius exec at Cingular finds a way to increase proffits by "borrowing" this idea and soon ALL the phone companies are doing it. It would be much harder to stop then.Also, in the article there is a note of a class-action suit in the state of Californa against Verizon for their promises on this phone. I'd like everyone who qualifys to sign up (unless of course you LIKE being walked on). That's the only way things will change unfortunatly.Now for a question: on CDMA networks, the phones have their ID number imbeded in them and you are tied to a specific carrier without reprogramming, right? Are problems like this as common with GSM phones (since in theory it should be easier for customers to switch providers/phones since they can take out the little SIM card)? I know things are supposed to be MUCH better overseas (Japan, Europe, etc) with phone features, but how much difference does GSM/CDMA make here in the states in regard to getting walked on by the phone companies?Re:Unfortunatly Common by ssimontis (Score:1)Saturday January 08, @07:07PM Re:Unfortunatly Common (Score:4, Informative) by DiscoOnTheSide (544139) <ajfili@@@eden...rutgers...edu> on Saturday January 08, @07:17PM (#11300149) (http://slashdot.org/) You're right about the CDMA phones being locked to their carriers, although I've heard a little blurb here and there about how in theory they could interoperate. GSM DOES have the capability of being multi-carrier, but in the US the carriers lock the software to their service. However, these are usually bypassable by either A) buy a european/asian GSM phone and just buying a SIM from the carriers, or B) using software found online to get the unlock code for the phone (usually an algorithm based on the IMEI number) which you enter in and *wham* multi-carrier phone. I'm planning on a European tripto Europe in the next year, so I unlocked my Nokia 3650 (T-Mobile) so when I'm over there I'll just buy a prepaid SIM that has so many minutes and I'll still have my phone. [ ParentRe:Unfortunatly Common by DiscoOnTheSide (Score:1)Saturday January 08, @07:20PMRe:Unfortunatly Common by RzUpAnmsCwrds (Score:2)Saturday January 08, @08:42PM1 reply beneath your current threshold.Re:Unfortunatly Common by maokh (Score:2)Sunday January 09, @01:39AMRe:Unfortunatly Common by CarrionBird (Score:2)Sunday January 09, @02:51PM Unfortunate - but did keep word (Score:2, Interesting) by bblazer (757395) * on Saturday January 08, @11:57PM (#11301687) (http://www.spaltedboard.com/ | Last Journal: Friday October 22, @11:48PM) I was one of the donators. It is unfortunate that no hacks were found in the time allotted. One good thing is that the organizer did keep his word and returned the donations. I got mine back yesterday.Re:Unfortunate - but did keep word by archeopterix (Score:2)Monday January 10, @06:01AM Interoperability (Score:1) by thestjohn (695076) on Monday January 10, @08:55AM (#11309115) I was under the impression that if handsets from competing networks used the same standard, then technically their handsets should interoperate between the networks. But then that's over here in the uk, where we only have one 3G standard. From what I can see, US citizens get CDMA (which is only 2.5G), CDMA2000, and UMTS, which is the standard we use over here I think.I work in mobile phone repair, and I've got an unlocked 3G phone to work on a 3G network other than it's parent company. What technical issues prevent you guys from doing it? aaah (Score:1) by thestjohn (695076) on Monday January 10, @08:59AM (#11309129) Just read a little more. Wasn't aware that simcard technology isn't being used in these phones. That certainly makes it difficult to remove the network lock. Damn, you guys have it bad over there for phones. You get screwed on prices, coverage, and now services it seems.3 replies beneath your current threshold.